Conflict at sea how the british defeat of the spanish armada changed the face of naval warfare1/28/2024 ![]() Even the loss of a single large Western warship, with a crew of 700 and a cost of running to hundreds of millions of dollars, would be regarded as politically catastrophic. military force in the region, Tehran would inevitably prove the ultimate loser in any conflict.īut privately, officers worry that their navies are relatively ill-equipped to manage an initial onslaught. Western militaries say they are more than capable of meeting any threat and analysts believe that, given the sheer weight of U.S. ![]() Iran has said it would close off the Gulf if it were attacked by powers, including the United States and Israel, who accuse it of developing nuclear arms. That, military officials and analysts say, would allow them to launch potentially devastating “”swarm” attacks. Navy and regional allies, Iran’s navy and Revolutionary Guard have poured resources into small gunboats. ![]() In readiness for any potential war with the U.S. Perhaps, some argue, they should follow the example of poorer states like Iran, who invest in large numbers of smaller ships rather than a handful of larger vessels that could be easily sunk. Navy has sent almost its entire fleet of small patrol boats and minesweepers to the region, hastily refitting some to dramatically increase their firepowerĬoncerns over the Gulf, a key oil conduit, play into a much wider debate about whether developed navies waste their money in pursuing a small number of sophisticated ships. Those vessels now look increasingly vulnerable to thousands of small, fast Iranian attack boats that could dominate the Gulf in the event conflict there. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For decades, Western navies have built ever larger, more expensive warships.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |